Posted by Daniel on March 3, 2007, 1:43 pm, in reply to "Foreigners involved on beach and mangrove"
189.165.21.226
Hi, Interesting post. Shouldn't there be a question mark after this? To me the post and the petition speaks about SUPPORTING the policy set forth by the president of Mexico and said nothing about being unhappy with Mexico or the way's it does things. I would like to ask John Simmons to please quote the lines in the post or petition for this comment. I have begun to do a bit of research on Article 33 of the Mexican Constitution which speaks about foreigners interfering in politics. I have found a lot of discussions on things like equal immigration laws etc. which is a separate subject. This post is about Article 33 and its implications and it is on that I would like to see the focus. Weather one agrees with Article 33 or not is really not the issue. Clarifying what Article 33 says and what the implications are regarding the petition some have signed is. Some questions I would like to find answers to are 1) Is supporting a law of Mexico also considered interfering? 2) Are environment issues considered politics? 3) The server of this message board is located in Texas i.e. the USA, what implications does that have in the policy set forth under article 33? Adios for now, Daniel Hallas |
Message Views: 12 |
Message Thread:
|
By posting, you confirm that you have read and Back |
Be sure to visit www.lamanzanilla.info